Origin of Cells
Guiding Questions:
- What plausible hypothesis could account for the origin of life?
- What intermediate stages could there have been between non-living matter and the first living cells?

SL and HL Content
Learning Objective A2.1.1 - Conditions on Early Earth and the Pre-Biotic Formation of Carbon Compounds
Early Earth: Setting the Scene
Around 4.5 billion years ago, Earth formed from collisions of dust and rock orbiting the young Sun.
Early Earth’s surface was molten rock with intense volcanic activity, frequent meteor impacts, and no life.
This period is called the Hadean eon (“Hades” = underworld) - symbolizing hellish, hostile conditions.
As the planet cooled, volcanic gases were released and formed the first atmosphere.
Composition of the Early Atmosphere
The early atmosphere was very different from today’s oxygen-rich air. •
Contained mainly:
Water vapour (H2O)
Carbon dioxide (CO2) - much higher than today
Methane (CH4) - a potent greenhouse gas
Ammonia (NH3)
Nitrogen (N2)
Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) and other volcanic gases
Free oxygen (O2) was absent, so no ozone (O3) layer existed.
Consequences of No Oxygen or Ozone
Without ozone, ultraviolet (UV) radiation from the Sun reached the surface unchecked.
UV radiation levels were ~100 times higher than today.
UV radiation can damage DNA, but it also provided the energy needed for early chemical reactions.
No oxygen also meant reducing conditions - ideal for the formation of simple organic molecules.
Greenhouse Effect and Surface Conditions
High CO2 and CH4 concentrations trapped heat (greenhouse effect), making Earth very hot.
The greenhouse effect:• Greenhouse gases absorb infrared radiation emitted by Earth. • They re-emit this energy, warming the surface.
Result: early Earth was a steamy, high-temperature world with violent storms and lightning.
Energy Sources for Chemical Reactions
Lightning, UV radiation, volcanic heat, and solar energy provided the energy for chemical synthesis.
These energy inputs drove reactions between gases in the early atmosphere, producing organic molecules.
The Pre-biotic Formation of Carbon Compounds
Under early Earth’s conditions, simple carbon compounds formed spontaneously - processes not seen today.
Examples of possible compounds formed:•
Amino acids → building blocks of proteins
Fatty acids → components of membranes
Nucleobases → parts of DNA/RNA
Simple sugars (e.g., ribose)
These reactions likely occurred in oceans, volcanic pools, or near hydrothermal vents - forming the so-called “primordial soup.”
The Primordial (Pre-biotic) Soup Hypothesis
Proposed independently by Alexander Oparin (1924) and J.B.S. Haldane (1929).
Suggested that life began in a “soup” of organic molecules formed in warm, shallow seas.
Over time, these molecules accumulated, interacted, and gave rise to more complex biomolecules.
Later experiments (e.g., the Miller–Urey experiment) supported this idea by synthesizing amino acids under simulated early-Earth conditions.
Dual Role of UV Radiation
While UV light could destroy fragile molecules, it also drove chemical evolution:
When UV broke down molecules, reactive fragments recombined into new
compounds.
For instance, pyruvic acid, when exposed to UV in water, can form larger organic molecules.
RNA and nucleotides may have had an advantage:
Nucleotide bases absorb UV efficiently, offering protection and stability.
This could explain why RNA molecules were favored early in Earth’s history (link to the RNA world hypothesis).
A2.1.2 - Cells as the Smallest Units of Self-Sustaining Life
1. The Concept of Life
Life is hard to define, but scientists agree that all living things share certain key features.
According to cell theory, cells are the smallest units of life - all living organisms are made
of one or more cells, and all cells come from pre-existing cells.
Every cell performs the essential functions of life, either alone (unicellular organisms) or as part of a multicellular system.
2. Characteristics of Living Organisms
All living things perform these seven functions of life:

3. The Cell: Smallest Self-Sustaining Unit
A cell can independently carry out all the above life functions.
It is the basic structural and functional unit of all organisms.
Every cell has:
Plasma membrane → separates it from the environment
DNA → stores hereditary information
Metabolic machinery → enzymes, ribosomes, organelles for energy use and synthesis
Cells are self-sustaining chemical systems - they metabolize, respond, and reproduce without needing another living cell to function.
4. Defining Life Scientifically
NASA’s working definition:
“Life is a self-sustaining chemical system capable of Darwinian evolution.”
This definition emphasizes three ideas:
1. Self-sustaining - performs metabolism and maintains homeostasis.
2. Chemical system - made of interacting molecules.
3. Darwinian evolution - reproduces with variation and can evolve by natural selection.
This helps guide the search for extraterrestrial life — e.g., possible microbial life on Mars or icy moons like Europa.
Ask: How might life on another planet look different from life on Earth?
5. A Systems View of Life
Living organisms are not just collections of molecules - they are integrated systems that:
Process and respond to information from their surroundings.
Regulate internal balance (feedback loops).
Evolve over time to improve survival.
Systems biology studies how interactions between parts create emergent properties - like consciousness or metabolism - that don’t exist in individual molecules.
6. Viruses: The Boundary Between Living and Non-Living
Viruses blur the line between life and non-life.
They are non-cellular particles made of:
Genetic material (DNA or RNA)
A protein coat (capsid)
Sometimes a lipid envelope (in enveloped viruses like influenza).
Why viruses are considered non-living:
No cells or organelles - cannot perform metabolism or generate ATP.
No independent reproduction - must hijack a host cell’s machinery to make copies.
No homeostasis - cannot regulate internal environment.
No response to stimuli in a self-sustaining way.
Why some argue they are “borderline”:
Contain genetic material and can mutate → allows evolution.
Undergo natural selection, e.g., evolving drug resistance.
Can adapt to new hosts or environments (e.g., COVID-19 variants).
Ask: If viruses evolve and adapt, should we redefine what it means to be “alive”?
Summary - Living vs Non-Living

A2.1.3 - Challenge of Explaining the Spontaneous Origin of Cells
The Central Question
All living cells today arise from pre-existing cells through cell division - this is the third principle of cell theory.
However, the first cells on Earth had to come from non-living materials (abiogenesis).
This creates one of biology’s biggest questions:
How did life begin from non-living matter?
Scientists can’t observe this process directly, so they reconstruct plausible steps through chemistry and experimentation.
Ask: Why is it difficult to prove how the first cells formed?
What Makes a Cell a “Self-Sustaining Systemˮ?
All modern cells share three essential features:
Membrane - a stable boundary separating internal and external environments.
Genetic material (DNA/RNA) - to store, copy, and transmit information.
Metabolic processes - to generate and use energy for maintenance, growth, and reproduction.
For the first cell to evolve, all three features (or precursors of them) had to emerge spontaneously.
Ask: Which of these features do you think evolved first - membrane, metabolism, or genes?
Four Stages Required for the Origin of Cells
Scientists hypothesize that four major steps were necessary for life to arise from non-life:
Synthesis of simple organic molecules
Abiotic production of amino acids, sugars, and lipids.
Supported by the Miller–Urey experiment, which simulated early Earth’s atmosphere and produced amino acids from methane, ammonia, hydrogen, and water vapour.
Assembly of simple molecules into polymers
Small carbon compounds joined to form larger macromolecules (proteins, RNA,
polysaccharides).
Could occur on hot sand, clay, or volcanic rock surfaces, even without enzymes.
Formation of membranes / compartmentalization
Lipids can self-assemble into spherical bilayers (vesicles) in water, forming protocells.
This created an internal environment distinct from surroundings - allowing chemical reactions to occur efficiently.
Development of self-replicating molecules
Molecules capable of copying themselves (like RNA) made inheritance possible.
This allowed Darwinian evolution - variation, selection, and adaptation.
Ask: Why was compartmentalization such a key step in the origin of life?
The “Protocellˮ - The First Living Systems
A protocell is a hypothetical primitive cell-like structure that formed from organic molecules enclosed in membranes.
Protocells likely:
Maintained internal chemistry different from their surroundings.
Absorbed simple molecules and grew.
Divided spontaneously when they became too large.
Over time, protocells may have developed genetic systems and metabolic networks, leading to true cells.
Competing Hypotheses for the Origin of Life
Protocell-First Hypothesis
Cell-like structures with primitive metabolism appeared before genetic material.
These protocells grew and divided; later they developed RNA or DNA to store information.
Prediction: Scientists might observe protocells forming spontaneously in lab conditions.
Gene-First (RNA World) Hypothesis
Life began with self-replicating RNA molecules.
RNA acted both as genetic material and catalyst (ribozyme activity).
Prediction: Complex RNA molecules could form spontaneously and evolve collectively.
Metabolism-First Hypothesis
A network of simple chemical reactions arose first, possibly on mineral surfaces (e.g., iron–sulfur minerals).
These reactions produced energy and organic molecules, eventually leading to compartments and genetic systems.
Prediction: Chemical mixtures under constant nutrient and energy flow could show autocatalysis and adaptive evolution.
Ask: Which theory do you think best explains how life could begin, and why?
Testing the Hypotheses: A Scientific Challenge
Exact conditions on early Earth are unknown, so scientists can’t fully replicate them.
The first protocells did not fossilize, leaving no direct evidence.
Experiments (like Miller–Urey) give clues but not complete proof.
Therefore, scientists take two approaches:
Bottom-up (chemical approach): Recreate pre-biotic chemistry (e.g., amino acid synthesis).
Top-down (biological approach): Study modern cells for ancient molecular relics (e.g., RNA catalysts).
Both approaches build indirect evidence for how life may have originated.
Ask: Why can’t scientists ever “prove” how the first cell formed — only support a theory?
Nature of Science (NOS) Connection
A scientific hypothesis must be testable, but not all hypotheses are easily testable.
The origin of the first cells is a historical event, not directly observable.
Scientists can test parts of the process (e.g., chemical synthesis of amino acids) but not the entire event.
This highlights an important idea in science:
Some questions may remain beyond current scientific capabilities, limited by technology or evidence.
Theories gain strength when multiple lines of evidence point in the same direction, even if direct proof is impossible.
